\documentclass[avery5371,grid]{flashcards}

% Font for back side of cards
\usepackage{fourier}

\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}

\cardfrontstyle[\LARGE]{headings}
\cardbackstyle[]{plain} % plain option centers text
\cardfrontfoot{Adages}

\setlength{\topskip}{0mm} % Eliminates extra space at top of page
\setlength{\cardmargin}{6mm} % Increases margin around contents

\newcounter{rule}
\setcounter{rule}{1}

% A new command in case we want to separate what we use to indicate 'number'
% May need to change this based on the font
\newcommand{\ksep}{\\ \vspace{5mm} No.}

% Testing


\begin{document}

\begin{flashcard}[Philosophical Razor]{Hanlon's Law}
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
\end{flashcard}

\begin{flashcard}[Philosophical Razor]{Alder's Razor}
If something cannot be settled by experiment or observation, then it is not worthy of debate.
\end{flashcard}

\begin{flashcard}[Philosophical Razor]{Grice's Razor}
As a principle of parsimony, conversational implicatures are to be preferred over semantic context for linguistic explanations.
\end{flashcard}

\begin{flashcard}[Philosophical Razor]{Hitchen's Razor}
That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
\end{flashcard}

\begin{flashcard}[Philosophical Razor]{Hume's Guillotine}
What ought to be cannot be deduced from what is; prescriptive claims cannot be derived solely from descriptive claims, and must depend on other prescriptions.
\end{flashcard}

\begin{flashcard}[Philosophical Razor]{Occam's Razor}
Explanations which require fewer unjustified assumptions are more likely to be correct; avoid unnecessary or improbably assumptions.
\end{flashcard}

\begin{flashcard}[Philosophical Razor]{Popper's Falsifiability Criterion}
For a theory to be considered scientific, it must be falsifiable.
\end{flashcard}

\begin{flashcard}[Philosophical Razor]{Sagan Standard}
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
\end{flashcard}

\begin{flashcard}[Law]{Clarke's First Law}
When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. \par\vspace{\baselineskip} When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
\end{flashcard}

\begin{flashcard}[Law]{Clarke's Second Law}
The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the improbable.
\end{flashcard}

\begin{flashcard}[Law]{Clarke's Third Law}
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
\end{flashcard}

\end{document}

\begin{flashcard}[]{}
\end{flashcard}