From b56dba32a2dc46bbbc484f7c4b09604ae45ffcd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kenneth Odle Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:36:01 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Updates to ch. 3; typofixes in other chapters --- 006/006 time.csv | 2 + 006/codex-006.tex | 4 +- 006/include/chap01.tex | 4 +- 006/include/chap02.tex | 4 +- 006/include/chap03.tex | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 006/include/chap04.tex | 7 ++-- 6 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/006/006 time.csv b/006/006 time.csv index 68a4b88..93cd253 100644 --- a/006/006 time.csv +++ b/006/006 time.csv @@ -44,3 +44,5 @@ Date,Topic,Minutes ,ch. 3 writing,60 2025.02.18,ch. 3 writing,90 ,,45 +2025.02.19,ch. 4 writing & bugfixing,60 +2025.02.21,ch. 3 edits,65 diff --git a/006/codex-006.tex b/006/codex-006.tex index c4bb95c..9415351 100644 --- a/006/codex-006.tex +++ b/006/codex-006.tex @@ -171,9 +171,9 @@ %\input{include/chap02} -%\input{include/chap03} +\input{include/chap03} -\input{include/chap04} +%\input{include/chap04} %\input{include/chap05} diff --git a/006/include/chap01.tex b/006/include/chap01.tex index 5a52366..5fd8c92 100644 --- a/006/include/chap01.tex +++ b/006/include/chap01.tex @@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ I did protest in the WordPress forums. I pointed out that this could be a great My comments did not fall on deaf ears. Instead, they fell on all-too-attentive ears who deleted my comments and posts. They also—without notice or warning—deleted my plugins from the WordPress plugin directory. (I sent emails asking why, and got generic responses in return that must linked to an equally generic ``your plugin may be deleted if…'' kind of page, which listed a number of reasons (which seemed eminently reasonable to me) why your plugins might be deleted from the repository, but none of which applied to me. (Which meant that there is an unwritten rule that your plugins may be deleted if you do not march in lock-step with The Powers That Be. But, of course.) -I've long been suspicious of the WordPress business model. It is often described as an open source project, and indeed, wordpress.\textit{org} is. In fact, it \textit{has} to be, since it was originally a fork of the \textsf{b2/cafelog} project.\footnote{Alas, the \textsf{cafelog} domain is now owned by a Singaporean gambling company. Such is life in late-stage capitalism.} Like other oligarchs, Matt Mullenweg didn't invent \textit{anything}—he just took something that previously existed, put his own label on it, and called it his own. +I've long been suspicious of the WordPress business model. It is often described as an open source project, and indeed, wordpress.\textit{org} is. In fact, it \textit{has} to be, since it was originally a fork of the \textsf{b2/cafelog} project.\footnote{Alas, the \texttt{cafelog} domain is now owned by a Singaporean gambling company. Such is life in late-stage capitalism.} Like other oligarchs, Matt Mullenweg didn't invent \textit{anything}—he just took something that previously existed, put his own label on it, and called it his own. I don't have too much issue with this, but what's unique in this situation is that wordpress.\textit{com} is \textbf{not} open source. It's a for-profit company that uses the open source WordPress software to sell websites to other people. There are lots of companies out there doing much the same thing. In fact, just about every webhosting company out there offers WordPress as a one-click isntall. (A long time ago, I was one of them, in my own small way, hosting websites built on WordPress for small businesses.\footnote{This business went away because a lot of small business owners make bad business decisions—on average, most small business go out of business in less than five years. Also, a lot of them decided to move their websites to Wix and Squarespace, thinking they would get more exposure as a result. Guess what? They didn't. You could ask them, but they've all gone out of business now. I did tell them, but they chose to believe random internet strangers who gave them easy answers, instead of me, an actual person who gave them difficult answers. Such is life.}) -The key difference between WordPress and all those other companies is that Matt Mullenweg holds the keys to \textit{both} wordpress.org and wordpress.com. Al the hundreds and thousands of people who have contributed hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of hours of their labor to wordpress.org—a non-profit open-source projet—have also been forced to contribute those same hours to wordpress.com—a for-profit company. And because Mullenweg has control over both, he can direct all those volunteers to direct their work in a way that benefits not just the non-profit, open-source project, but also the for-profit company. +The key difference between WordPress and all those other companies is that Matt Mullenweg holds the keys to \textit{both} wordpress.org and wordpress.com. Al the hundreds and thousands of people who have contributed hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of hours of their labor to wordpress.org—a non-profit open-source project—have also been forced to contribute those same hours to wordpress.com—a for-profit company. And because Mullenweg has control over both, he can direct all those volunteers to direct their work in a way that benefits not just the non-profit, open-source project, but also the for-profit company. This is a tremendous conflict of interest. Part of the purpose of the Gutenberg project was to make all those page-building plugins in the WordPress plugin repository unnecessary—and to impact the companies producing them with a financial hit, since most of them include both free (but limited) and paid (and thus, fully-featured) options. If their customers no longer need those plugins because their capabilities are now part of WordPress core, those companies lose out on income, and possibly go out of business, meaning that wordpress.\textit{com} has fewer competitors.\footnote{Squashing your competitors is a feature, not a bug, of capitalism. If it weren't we wouldn't need anti-trust laws, would we?} diff --git a/006/include/chap02.tex b/006/include/chap02.tex index 5748c25..f797280 100644 --- a/006/include/chap02.tex +++ b/006/include/chap02.tex @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -\chapter{Easy Flashcards in \LaTeX{} } +\chapter{Easy Flash Cards in \LaTeX{} }\label{flashcards} \section{Introduction} @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Fair enough. There's really no point in memorizing anything unless you are going There isn't, really, outside of a few specialized contexts, like memorizing your lines if you're in a play or memorizing vocabulary if you're learning another language. (Although the best way to learn another langauge is to just use that language as much as possible. The problem is that doing that just isn't feasible most of the time, unless you're willing to just D.B. Cooper yourself out of an airplane into a small village somewhere in southwest France.) Even so, there's always the example of the Shakespearean actor who can pull out just the right pithy Shakespearean line for any given occasion. But even here, the prinicples is still the same: the actor can just pull these lines form memory not because they sat down and memorized them, but because they uttered them every night for weeks or months on end in the context of the entire play, not in isolation. -So why do we expect students to memorize stuff? Because memorization is the easiest form of learning to test, and thus, it's the easiest way to prove that we have taught them something. It's easy to see if students have memorized all the presidents in order, but it's quite another thing to see if those same students can explain why the vast majority of those presidents are some variation of the average mediocre white guy born into generational wealth. To paraphrase Paulo Freire, all education functions to either support the status quo or to overturn it,\footnote{His actual quote was ``There is no such thing as neutral education. Education either functions as an instrument to bring about conformity or freedom.'' He also said ``When education is not liberating, the dream of the oppressed is to become the oppressor.'' Those two quote say a \textit{log} about our modern system of education.} and since the people who hire and pay teachers have a great desire to maintain the status quo (where we just don't question our systems regardless of the inequities built into them and the resulting inequalities we see in our society), there is a lot of pressure to just get students to memorize things and to never question the status quo. +So why do we expect students to memorize stuff? Because memorization is the easiest form of learning to test, and thus, it's the easiest way to prove that we have taught them something. It's easy to see if students have memorized all the presidents in order, but it's quite another thing to see if those same students can explain why the vast majority of those presidents are some variation of the average mediocre white guy born into generational wealth. To paraphrase Paulo Freire, all education functions to either support the status quo or to overturn it,\footnote{His actual quote was ``There is no such thing as neutral education. Education either functions as an instrument to bring about conformity or freedom.'' He also said ``When education is not liberating, the dream of the oppressed is to become the oppressor.'' Those two quote say a \textit{lot} about our modern system of education.} and since the people who hire and pay teachers have a great desire to maintain the status quo (where we just don't question our systems regardless of the inequities built into them and the resulting inequalities we see in our society), there is a lot of pressure to just get students to memorize things and to never question the status quo. \kdive{0} One of the best ways I've found to memorize information is to use flash cards. As I see it, flash cards have three main advantages. First, you have to write this information onto the flash cards, so you have yet another opportunity to review the information. (I tend to learn better by reading and writing than by listening.) Second, because you have to fit the information on an index card, you have to edit the information, which is yet another opportunity to process the information. Third, because each bit of information is on a separate card, you can easily sort these cards as you study them, gradually setting aside the cards you know, so that you can focus on the material you still need to learn. diff --git a/006/include/chap03.tex b/006/include/chap03.tex index 4140b18..bebf464 100644 --- a/006/include/chap03.tex +++ b/006/include/chap03.tex @@ -2,42 +2,66 @@ One of the most confusing things in \LaTeX{} for some people is how to format text, especially when you are creating some custom macros that change the appearance of text. -There are two key concepts to keep in mind here. The first concept to keep in mind here is that \LaTeX{} has both \textit{commands} and \textit{environments} to style text. The second concept is that ``text'' is not just a collection of characters, but a collection of characters with \textit{distinct groups of characteristics}. +There are two key concepts to keep in mind here. The first concept to keep in mind here is that \LaTeX{} has both \textit{commands} and \textit{switch commands} to style text. The second is that ``text'' is not just a collection of characters, but a collection of characters with \textit{distinct groups of characteristics}. \section{Text Characteristics} -The history of making marks on paper (or clay) goes a long way back in our history, so the subject of type and how to talk about it is complex, but interesting. Needless to say, we don't have the space to discuss all of it here, so we'll just look at those things that \LaTeX{} gives us control over. Those characteristics are: +The history of making marks on paper (or clay, or cave walls, or skin) goes a long way back in human history, so the subject of type and how to talk about it is complex, but interesting. Needless to say, we don't have the space to discuss all of it here, so we'll just look at those things that \LaTeX{} gives us control over. Those characteristics are: \begin{itemize}[noitemsep] -\item Typeface +\item Family \item Shape \item Series \item Size \end{itemize} -Let's look at each of these in turn.\footnote{For the illustrations here, I am hugely grateful to the StackExhange user \kref{https://tex.stackexchange.com/users/4918/tobi}{Tobi}, who provided examples at \kref{https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/139592/245702}{https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/139592/245702}.} +Let's look at each of these in turn. But first, let's clear up a bit of confusion about the terms \textit{font} and \textit{typeface}. -\subsection{Typefaces} +\subsection{Typefaces vs. Fonts} -For better or for worse, the rise of the Apple Macintosh led to a blurring between the words ``typeface'' and ``font''. What most people mean when they say ``font'' and what your GUI-based word-processing program is actually referring to in its ``Font'' menu is actually a \textit{typeface}, which means a collection of characters styled in a particular way. ``Times New Roman'' is a typeface, ``Verdana'' and ``Arial'' are others. +For better or for worse, the rise of the Apple Macintosh led to a blurring between the meaning of the words ``typeface'' and ``font''. What most people mean when they say ``font'' and what your GUI-based word-processing program is referring to in its ``Font'' menu is actually a \textit{typeface}, which means a collection of characters styled in a particular way. ``Times New Roman'' is a typeface, ``Verdana'' and ``Arial'' are others. -A font, on the other hand, actually refers to a collection of characteristics, including shape, series, and size. ``Times New Roman'' is a typeface; ``Times New Roman bold italic 10 point'' is a font. This distinction goes back to the days when typefaces were physical objects made of lead. +A \textit{font}, on the other hand, actually refers to a collection of characteristics, including shape, series, and size. ``Times New Roman'' is a typeface; ``Times New Roman bold italic 10 point'' is a font. This distinction goes back to the days when typefaces were physical objects made of lead. -Typefaces fall into a number of different categories, including serif, sans-serif, proportional, and monospace. +In actuality, your ``Font'' menu should really be called the ``Typeface'' menu, because you are selecting a typeface, and not a font.\footnote{I am not entirely sure why this menu ended up being called ``Font'' instead of ``Typeface''. It might have to do with saving screen space, or it might have to do with somebody not understanding the difference between the two. Or, knowing the history of the Apple corporation, it might have to do with hubris. I hope to find out some day.} You might use the same typeface throughout a family (and you really should use no more than two or three in a document, unless your intention is to write a ransom note), but if you use bold or italic, or different sizes, those are in reality, different fonts. -A serif font has small decorative lines attached to the ends of letters, whereas a sans-serif font does not. This zine is typeset using the \textsf{kpfonts} package, which uses serif fonts that were originally derived from the URW Palladio font\footnote{See \kref{https://fontesk.com/palladio-typeface/}{https://fontesk.com/palladio-typeface/} and \kref{https://ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/kpfonts?lang=en}{https://ctan.org/tex-archiv\\e/fonts/kpfonts?lang=en}.} so all the letters you see here have serifs. I also use the Cantarell font in some places, which is a sans-serif font.\footnote{See \kref{https://ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/cantarell?lang=en}{https://ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/cantarell?lang=en}.} \textsf{This sentence is typeset in a sans-serif font.} +\subsection{Family} -In a proportional font, each letter takes up a different width. Some letters, such as \textsf{m} and \textsf{w}, are fairly wide, whereas other, such as \textsf{i} and \textsf{l}, are fairly narrow, and most other letters are somewhere in between. In a monospace font, each letter takes up the same exact width. The \textsf{kpfonts} package I use for the text in this zine is a proportional font, but the code samples are in a monospace font. \texttt{This sentence is typeset in a monospace font.} Typewriters typically use a monospace font, but as computers became commonly available, a few of them could actually type in a proportional font.\footnote{Typewriters are a particular love of mine, and I can go on about them at considerable length. Don't get me started.} +Typefaces fall into a number of different categories, including serif, sans-serif, proportional, and monospace. In \LaTeX{} we refer to those as a ``family''. \LaTeX{} recognizes three families: roman (i.e., serif), sans-serif, and monospace. + +A serif font has small decorative lines attached to the ends of letters, whereas a sans-serif font does not. This zine is typeset using the \textsf{kpfonts} package, which uses serif fonts that were originally derived from the URW Palladio font\footnote{See \kref{https://fontesk.com/palladio-typeface/}{https://fontesk.com/palladio-typeface/} and \kref{https://ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/kpfonts}{https://ctan.org/tex-archiv\\e/fonts/kpfonts}.} so all the letters you see here have serifs. When I need a sans-serif font,\footnote{I've made up a change in this issue to start using a sans-serif font for \LaTeX{} package names. If I had known this little project was going to go to six issues, I would have created an in-house style sheet first.} I use the Cantarell font.\footnote{See \kref{https://ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/cantarell}{https://ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/cantarell}.} \textsf{This sentence is typeset in a sans-serif font.} + +Both the Palladio and Cantarell fonts used in this zine are proportional fonts. In a proportional font, each letter takes up a different width. Some letters, such as \textsf{m} and \textsf{w}, are fairly wide, whereas other, such as \textsf{i} and \textsf{l}, are fairly narrow, and most other letters are somewhere in between. + +In a monospace font (which is also called a fixed width font), each letter takes up the same exact width. The \textsf{kpfonts} package I use for the text in this zine is a proportional font, but the code samples are in a monospace font. \texttt{This sentence is typeset in a monospace font.} Typewriters typically use a monospace font, but as computers became commonly available, a few were produced that could actually type in a proportional font.\footnote{Typewriters are a particular love of mine, and I can go on about them at considerable length. Don't get me started.} + +You can see this in action if we compare five of the same characters with different widths, first in a proportional font, and then in a monospace font: + +\begin{itemize}[noitemsep] +\item[] \texttt{iiiii} iiiii +\item[] \texttt{nnnnn} nnnnn +\item[] \texttt{WWWWW} WWWWW +\end{itemize} + +You can easily see that the first set of letters in a monospace font all takes up the same amount of space, but the second set in a proportional font takes up widely different amounts of space.\footnote{Again, this is a remarkably difficult concept for some people to understand. Again, see most of chapter \ref{flashcards}.} + +Interestingly, both proportional and monospace fonts can be either serif or sans-serif. The first three issues of this zine used a sans-serif monospace font for the code samples. I've never particularly cared for most sans-serif fonts, but I learned I could pass the \texttt{[nott]} option to the \textsf{kpfonts} package, which prevents it from modifying the default fixed width fonts. \subsection{Shape} -The \textit{shape} of a font refers to how the individual characters are formed.\footnote{This is a terrible definition, but it is what it is. I didn't make the rules here.} Shape can be upright (i.e., ``normal'' or ``roman''), italic, slanted, and small caps. +The \textit{shape} of a font refers to how the individual characters are formed.\footnote{This is a terrible definition, but it is what it is. I didn't make the rules here.} Shape can be upright (i.e., ``normal'' or ``roman''), italic, slanted, and/or small caps.\footnote{For the illustrations in this section, I am hugely grateful to the StackExhange user \kref{https://tex.stackexchange.com/users/4918/tobi}{Tobi}, who provided examples at \kref{https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/139592/245702}{https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/139592/245702}.} -Both italic and slanted shapes lean to the right. The main difference between the two occurs when you apply this to a \textit{serif}. A slanted shape is just that: it's as if you had written out the text on a flexible substrate and then just stretched it a bit so it leans to the right. An italic shape, however, actually has a completely different, somewhat more curvy shape to each character. Italic or oblique shapes are often used to emphasize a word or group of words (i.e., ``This is \textit{very} good cake.'') but it also used by convention to indicate the titles of books and movies (i.e., \textit{The Grapes of Wrath}, \textit{Star Wars}). +Both italic and slanted shapes lean to the right. The main difference between the two occurs when you apply this to a serif font. A slanted shape is just that: it's as if you had written out the text on a flexible substrate and then just stretched it a bit so it leans to the right. An italic shape, however, actually has a completely different, somewhat more curvy shape to each character. \textsl{This is slanted text}, and \textit{this is italic text}. Italic or slanted shapes are often used to emphasize a word or group of words (i.e., ``This is \textit{very} good cake.'') but it also used by convention to indicate the titles of books and movies (i.e., \textit{The Grapes of Wrath}, \textit{Star Wars}). Small caps is shorthand for ``small capitals'' and refers to text in which all the lower-case characters are substituted by their upper-case equivalents. \textsc{This text is in small caps.} Small caps is often used to convey prestige and stability. -This is what they look like in a serif typeface: +I should also point out that small caps are not the same as using capital letters, and typesetting the first letter of a word in a larger size. (Notice that I said ``upper-case \textit{equivalents}'' above.) Small caps are a separate set of glyphs in which all the characters have the same stroke thickness. + +\begin{center} +\frame{\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{smallcaps}} +\end{center} + +This is what all these different variations look like in a serif typeface: \ksamp{large}{Normal abc}{-3}{-2} @@ -49,33 +73,27 @@ And here is what they look like in a sans-serif typeface: It's interesting to note that in the Cantarell typeface, the italic and the slanted shapes are pretty much identical, and it also doesn't include a small caps version at all. Some font packages include these, and some do not. As always, you should read the font documentation to see what is included. -I should also point out that small caps are not the same as using capital letters, and typesetting the first letter of a word in a larger size. Small caps are a separate set of glyphs in which all the characters have the same stroke thickness. - -\begin{center} -\frame{\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{smallcaps}} -\end{center} - \subsection{Series} Series is usually known as \textit{weight}, or how bold a particular bit of text is. In theory, you could have a number of different series or weights (and CSS does allow for this) but in reality, most typefaces are available either as \textit{normal} (i.e., not bold) or \textit{bold}. (A few also have a ``light'' option, but this is rare in my experience.) -Almost all of the text you read is ``normal'' weight, but \textbf{this bit is in bold} (which is also called ``boldface''). Boldface is sometimes used for emphasis, but it is more typically used to highlight important words or phrases. +Almost all of the text you read is ``normal'' weight, but \textbf{this bit is in bold} (which is also called ``boldface''). Boldface is sometimes used for emphasis, but it is more typically used to highlight important words or phrases. It is also used a lot in headlines, and you can see that in this zine, where the chapter names, as well as the names of sections and subsections within each chapter, are all printed in bold. \subsection{Size} -Size is easy to figure out: it just refers to how large a bit of text appears, either on screen or on paper. In reality, a typeface's size is much more complicated than that. Font sizes are usually measured in \textbf{points}, the size of which has varied over the years. With digital printing, points are usually defined as being \nicefrac{1}{72} of an inch, or exactly $0.352\bar{7}$ millimeters. (I could go on at length about this, but I won't. If you are interested, you might want to read \kref{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_(typography)}{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point\_(typograp\\hy)}.) +Size is easy to figure out: it just refers to how large a bit of text appears, either on screen or on paper. In reality, a typeface's size is much more complicated than that. Font sizes are usually measured in \textbf{points}, the size of which has varied over the years. With digital printing, points are usually defined as being \nicefrac{1}{72} of an inch, or exactly $0.352\bar{7}$ millimeters. (I could go on at length about this, but I won't. If you are interested, you might want to read \kref{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_(typography)}{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point\_(typography)}.\footnote{I'm not going to talk about type size here, because it's fairly straightforward in \LaTeX{} and I also mentioned how to get specific font sizes in issue \#4.} \section{Commands and Environments} \LaTeX{} has both modal commands that change \textit{all} the text following that command, and environments that change the text only within that environment. -\paragraph{Notes:} Most document classes use a roman font by default, to set entire passages in a different shape, use one of the three shape \texttt{} commands. \verb|\textrm{}| can be used to return to a roman font in an extended passage of either sans-serif or monospace text. +\paragraph{Notes:} Most document classes (but not all) use a roman (that is, a serif) font by default; to set entire passages in a different shape, use one of the three shape \texttt{} switch commands. \verb|\textrm{}| can be used to return to a roman font in an extended passage of either sans-serif or monospace text, for example. -Likewide, \verb|\upshape| can be used to return a regular shape in an extended passage of italic, slanted, or small caps text. Similarly, to return to a regular shape in a shorter passage of italic, slanted, or small caps text, you can use \verb|\textup{}|. +Likewise, \verb|\upshape| can be used to return a regular shape in an extended passage of italic, slanted, or small caps text. Similarly, to return to a regular shape in a shorter passage of italic, slanted, or small caps text, you can use \verb|\textup{}|. \verb|\textmd{}| can be used in the middle of a long passage of bold faced text to omit a word or two from being bold. -The commands and environments are summarized in the following table. Notice that it's a lot easier to remember them when you know what characteristic (family, shape, series) you are targeting, and what the two-letter code (\texttt{rm}, \texttt{bf}, etc.) stands for. +The commands and environments are summarized in the following table. It's a lot easier to remember them when you know what characteristic (family, shape, series) you are targeting, and what the two-letter code (\texttt{rm}, \texttt{bf}, etc.) stands for. \newpage @@ -90,7 +108,7 @@ The commands and environments are summarized in the following table. Notice that hlines = {0.5pt,solid}, vline{1,5} = {0.5pt,solid}, vline{2} = {2-10}{0.5pt,solid}, - rows = {5mm, m, rowsep=1.5pt}, + rows = {5mm, m, rowsep=3pt}, rowhead = 1, cells = {font=\sffamily\fontsize{8pt}{10pt}\selectfont}, row{1} = {font=\bfseries}, @@ -100,16 +118,17 @@ The commands and environments are summarized in the following table. Notice that cell{9}{1} = {r=2}{c}, cell{11}{1}= {c=2}{l}, } -& Characteristic & Command & Environment \\ -\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{Family} & Roman & \verb|\rmfamily| & \verb|\textrm{}| \\ +& Characteristic & Switch Command & Command \\ +\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{Family} & Roman* & \verb|\rmfamily| & \verb|\textrm{}| \\ & Sans-Serif & \verb|\sffamily| & \verb|\textsf{}| \\ & Monospace & \verb|\ttfamily| & \verb|\texttt{}| \\ -\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{Shape} & Italic & \verb|\itshape| & \verb|\textit{}| \\ - & Upright & \verb|\upshape| & \verb|\textup{}| \\ +\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{Shape} & Upright* & \verb|\upshape| & \verb|\textup{}| \\ + & Italic & \verb|\itshape| & \verb|\textit{}| \\ & Slanted & \verb|\slshape| & \verb|\textsl{}| \\ & Small Caps & \verb|\scshape| & \verb|\textsc{}| \\ -\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{Series} & Boldface & \verb|\bfseries| & \verb|\textbf{}| \\ - & Medium & \verb|\mdseries| & \verb|\textmd{}| \\ -{Return to normal\\for the class} & & \verb|\normalfont| & \verb|\textnormal{}| \\ +\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{Series} & Medium* & \verb|\mdseries| & \verb|\textmd{}| \\ + & Boldface & \verb|\bfseries| & \verb|\textbf{}| \\ +{Return to the default \\style for the \\document class} & & \verb|\normalfont| & \verb|\textnormal{}| \\ \end{longtblr} +\paragraph{Note:}An asterisk (*) indicates the typical default for most document classes. diff --git a/006/include/chap04.tex b/006/include/chap04.tex index 741ce8d..6fee988 100644 --- a/006/include/chap04.tex +++ b/006/include/chap04.tex @@ -15,10 +15,9 @@ Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec ornare luctus sem \caption{Detail of Margaret Sarah Carpenter's portrait of Ada Lovelace} \end{wrapfigure} -Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Mauris ac pretium purus. Nulla at magna turpis. Sed cursus placerat laoreet. Cras nec scelerisque eros, at egestas nisi. Proin volutpat sollicitudin ante, dapibus finibus eros tempus nec. Phasellus tristique tincidunt elit in molestie. Nunc maximus pulvinar erat, eu viverra arcu sollicitudin eget. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia curae; Nam accumsan volutpat imperdiet. Duis vel eros sit amet mi finibus dapibus. Donec in odio turpis. Fusce lobortis tempus nisl a bibendum. Suspendisse volutpat erat enim, eu volutpat risus consectetur ut. +Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec ornare luctus sem non ullamcorper. Proin dignissim condimentum orci at ultricies. Aenean tellus augue, posuere eu eleifend ac, tincidunt ut odio. Donec tempus ac tortor facilisis venenatis. Mauris eu dolor dui. Maecenas mollis, erat eget auctor ornare, nisl justo feugiat felis, vitae placerat arcu enim in lorem. Vestibulum vestibulum malesuada ligula et tincidunt. Fusce augue nisi, eleifend ac rutrum eget, hendrerit et massa. Vivamus pharetra aliquam magna sit amet vehicula. Nam augue lacus, condimentum a ornare non, pharetra id nulla. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Donec sagittis, lacus in tempor condimentum, nibh massa fermentum est, non sodales justo velit vitae purus. Curabitur at lobortis dui. Donec ut sem magna. Nam ante dolor, elementum eu eros ac, pharetra laoreet libero. Vestibulum iaculis, ante sit amet imperdiet rutrum, felis nulla luctus leo, nec egestas lacus neque ac metus. -Vestibulum porttitor ultrices vehicula. Maecenas nec nisl blandit, accumsan lectus vel, facilisis nisl. Praesent nulla metus, feugiat sed tincidunt sed, ultricies ut odio. Duis metus ligula, sagittis ut dui nec, lacinia posuere mi. Aenean efficitur tortor vel molestie feugiat. Nam dictum consectetur lacus nec semper. Proin feugiat enim ac mi hendrerit, ut porta enim consequat. Donec et vulputate sapien, ac consectetur sapien. Nunc erat metus, viverra ac faucibus id, dictum ut risus. Donec dapibus lobortis arcu, ac tincidunt est suscipit id. Aenean quis mattis risus. Cras a pulvinar mauris. +Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec ornare luctus sem non ullamcorper. Proin dignissim condimentum orci at ultricies. Aenean tellus augue, posuere eu eleifend ac, tincidunt ut odio. Donec tempus ac tortor facilisis venenatis. Mauris eu dolor dui. Maecenas mollis, erat eget auctor ornare, nisl justo feugiat felis, vitae placerat arcu enim in lorem. Vestibulum vestibulum malesuada ligula et tincidunt. Fusce augue nisi, eleifend ac rutrum eget, hendrerit et massa. Vivamus pharetra aliquam magna sit amet vehicula. Nam augue lacus, condimentum a ornare non, pharetra id nulla. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Donec sagittis, lacus in tempor condimentum, nibh massa fermentum est, non sodales justo velit vitae purus. Curabitur at lobortis dui. Donec ut sem magna. Nam ante dolor, elementum eu eros ac, pharetra laoreet libero. Vestibulum iaculis, ante sit amet imperdiet rutrum, felis nulla luctus leo, nec egestas lacus neque ac metus. -Aliquam venenatis augue purus, eu placerat augue hendrerit at. Praesent nunc metus, euismod nec dictum sit amet, elementum id justo. Suspendisse mollis ultricies purus. Nam augue dui, auctor a tristique sagittis, tincidunt ut ligula. Proin egestas tellus augue, sed vestibulum purus euismod at. Donec in lacinia neque. Donec non tempus nulla, ac mollis est. Vivamus lacus erat, maximus ut lorem ut, mattis porta magna. Integer sit amet urna sed dolor vestibulum sodales. Integer diam orci, finibus quis lobortis ac, tincidunt id mauris. Proin ut neque vitae enim facilisis consectetur et sit amet tellus. +Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec ornare luctus sem non ullamcorper. Proin dignissim condimentum orci at ultricies. Aenean tellus augue, posuere eu eleifend ac, tincidunt ut odio. Donec tempus ac tortor facilisis venenatis. Mauris eu dolor dui. Maecenas mollis, erat eget auctor ornare, nisl justo feugiat felis, vitae placerat arcu enim in lorem. Vestibulum vestibulum malesuada ligula et tincidunt. Fusce augue nisi, eleifend ac rutrum eget, hendrerit et massa. Vivamus pharetra aliquam magna sit amet vehicula. Nam augue lacus, condimentum a ornare non, pharetra id nulla. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Donec sagittis, lacus in tempor condimentum, nibh massa fermentum est, non sodales justo velit vitae purus. Curabitur at lobortis dui. Donec ut sem magna. Nam ante dolor, elementum eu eros ac, pharetra laoreet libero. Vestibulum iaculis, ante sit amet imperdiet rutrum, felis nulla luctus leo, nec egestas lacus neque ac metus. -Aenean nec porta nulla, nec mollis elit. Aenean cursus justo tortor, et vehicula sapien dapibus facilisis. Integer sed dictum mi. Etiam eget aliquam dui, vitae laoreet eros. Etiam dapibus neque quis libero tempor, commodo viverra augue rutrum. Proin et bibendum lorem. Aliquam erat volutpat. Aenean quis consectetur nisi. Sed leo velit, feugiat ac condimentum sit amet, volutpat eget dolor. Quisque ac efficitur tortor. Donec ut ipsum eu turpis fringilla varius. \ No newline at end of file