Proof read TAGS_FOR_RELATIVE_SETLOC (#357)

There was not much to fix in this part of the code except for a few comment fixes. But I am unsure as to whether the [subroutine calls on page 36](http://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/ScansForConversion/Comanche055/0036.jpg) were left out intentionally or are just missing. Should they be added?

EDIT: Also, this closes #263
This commit is contained in:
Felix Wittwer 2018-10-23 10:35:17 +02:00 committed by James Harris
parent 2e7cb6e8d4
commit c3f93c3ccf

View File

@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ IMUCAL1 EQUALS
STBLEORB EQUALS
E/PROG EQUALS
MIDDGIM EQUALS
BNKSUM 04
BANK 5
@ -146,6 +145,8 @@ E/PROG1 EQUALS
MODCHG3 EQUALS
BNKSUM 13
# SPACER
# MODULE 3 CONTAINS BANKS 14 THROUGH 21
BANK 14
@ -379,10 +380,9 @@ LOUNITX EQUALS XUNIT # 2DEC .5
LOUNITY EQUALS YUNIT # 2DEC 0
LOUNITZ EQUALS ZUNIT # 2DEC 0
3/4LOWDP EQUALS 3/4 # 2DEC 3.0 B-2
SBANK= LOWSUPER
# ROPE-SPECIFIC ASSIGNS OBVIATING NEED TO CHECK COMPUTER FLAG IN DETERMINING(?) INTEGRATION AREA ENTRIES.
# ROPE SPECIFIC ASSIGNS OBVIATING NEED TO CHECK COMPUTER FLAG IN DETVRUZVING INTEGRATION AREA ENTRIES
OTHPREC EQUALS LEMPREC
ATOPOTH EQUALS ATOPLEM
@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ THISAXIS = UNITX
ERASID EQUALS LOW10 # DOWNLINK ERASABLE DUMP ID
DELAYNUM EQUALS THREE
#********************************************************************************************************
#***************************************************************************************************************
# THE FOLLOWING ECADRS ARE DEFINED TO FACILITATE EBANK SWITCHING. THEY ALSO MAKE IT EASIER FOR
# ERASABLE CONTROL TO REARRANGE ERASABLE MEMORY WITHOUT DISRUPTING THE PROGRAMS WHICH SET EBANKS.
@ -428,9 +428,8 @@ EBQPLACE ECADR QPLACES
EBANK= RN1
EBRN1 ECADR RN1
#******************************************************************************************************
#***************************************************************************************************************
# Page 36
# *** END OF MAIN PROGRAM ***