Proof read TAGS_FOR_RELATIVE_SETLOC (#357)

There was not much to fix in this part of the code except for a few comment fixes. But I am unsure as to whether the [subroutine calls on page 36](http://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/ScansForConversion/Comanche055/0036.jpg) were left out intentionally or are just missing. Should they be added?

EDIT: Also, this closes #263

Comanche055/TAGS_FOR_RELATIVE_SETLOC.agc

@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ IMUCAL1		EQUALS
 STBLEORB	EQUALS
 E/PROG		EQUALS
 MIDDGIM		EQUALS
-
 		BNKSUM	04
 
 		BANK	5
@@ -146,6 +145,8 @@ E/PROG1		EQUALS
 MODCHG3		EQUALS
 		BNKSUM	13
 
+# SPACER
+
 # MODULE 3 CONTAINS BANKS 14 THROUGH 21
 
 		BANK 	14
@@ -379,10 +380,9 @@ LOUNITX		EQUALS	XUNIT			# 2DEC .5
 LOUNITY		EQUALS	YUNIT			# 2DEC 0
 LOUNITZ		EQUALS	ZUNIT			# 2DEC 0
 3/4LOWDP	EQUALS	3/4			# 2DEC 3.0 B-2
-
 		SBANK=	LOWSUPER
 
-# ROPE-SPECIFIC ASSIGNS OBVIATING NEED TO CHECK COMPUTER FLAG IN DETERMINING(?) INTEGRATION AREA ENTRIES.
+# ROPE SPECIFIC ASSIGNS OBVIATING NEED TO CHECK COMPUTER FLAG IN DETVRUZVING INTEGRATION AREA ENTRIES
 
 OTHPREC		EQUALS	LEMPREC
 ATOPOTH		EQUALS	ATOPLEM
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ THISAXIS	=	UNITX
 ERASID		EQUALS	LOW10			# DOWNLINK ERASABLE DUMP ID
 DELAYNUM	EQUALS	THREE
 
-#********************************************************************************************************
+#***************************************************************************************************************
 
 #   THE FOLLOWING ECADRS ARE DEFINED TO FACILITATE EBANK SWITCHING.  THEY ALSO MAKE IT EASIER FOR
 # ERASABLE CONTROL TO REARRANGE ERASABLE MEMORY WITHOUT DISRUPTING THE PROGRAMS WHICH SET EBANKS.
@@ -428,9 +428,8 @@ EBQPLACE	ECADR	QPLACES
 		EBANK=	RN1
 EBRN1		ECADR	RN1
 
-#******************************************************************************************************
+#***************************************************************************************************************
 
 # Page 36
 
 # *** END OF MAIN PROGRAM ***
-