kjodle/essays-ccs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Updating RBG.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Dessalines 2020-09-20 16:01:10 -04:00
parent b330422fb6
commit 76fc18b6d8
1 changed files with 3 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
socialism_faq.md
View File

@ -1023,6 +1023,7 @@ Much credit to [David Kinder's current affairs article, the rise of the Ruth Bad
#### Native peoples, immigrants, and treatment of minorities.
- [Ruled against the Oneida tribe over a dispute regarding its territorial claim, her majority opinion stating: "We hold that the tribe cannot unilaterally revive its ancient sovereignty, in whole or in part, over the parcels at issue."](https://michaelleroyoberg.com/uncategorized/on-the-notorious-rbg-and-sherrill/) [2](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Sherrill_v._Oneida_Indian_Nation_of_New_York)
- [In Navajo Nation v. United States Forest Service, she ruled against the Navajo nation, who have consistently protested US encroachment of a US forest-service run ski resort on Navajo territory known as the sacred San Francisco Peaks.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navajo_Nation_v._United_States_Forest_Service)
- [A podcast by Red Nation, w/ Rebecca Nagle, on the Supreme court's Oklahoma Decision.](https://soundcloud.com/therednationpod/oklahoma-welcome-to-the-rez-w)
- [Helped push through the Atlantic coast pipeline, to allow it to cross through federal and native lands.](https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/15/supreme-court-allows-atlantic-coast-pipeline-to-cross-appalachian-trail-320466), [2](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Forest_Service_v._Cowpasture_River_Preservation_Assn.)
- [Refused to block keystone XL pipeline.](https://archive.is/5ppOn)
@ -1039,6 +1040,8 @@ Much credit to [David Kinder's current affairs article, the rise of the Ruth Bad
- [In Heien v. North Carolina, Ginsburg held that the police may justifiably pull over cars if they believe they are violating the law, even if the police are misunderstanding the law, so long as the mistake was reasonable.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heien_v._North_Carolina)
- [In Plumhoff v. Rickard, she concurred with the court that held that the family of two men could not sue the police after they had shot and killed them for fleeing a police stop.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plumhoff_v._Rickard)
- [In Taylor v. Barkes, she concurred with the Court that held that the family of a suicidal man who was jailed and then killed himself could not sue the jail for failing to implement anti-suicide measures.](https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/taylor-v-barkes/)
- [In Nieves v Bartlett, agreed that cops should be protected from lawsuits as long as they cite probable cause in the original arrest.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nieves_v._Bartlett)
- [In Scott v. Harris, a high-speed chase involved a motorist being paralyzed after the cop ran his car off the road. Since the motorist had no charges or suspicion, the court was asked to decide whether the chase consititued unreasonable search and seizure, and whether running a car off the road constitutes deadly force that should be liable to lawsuits. Justice John Paul Stevens, the lone dissenter, argued that the videotape evidence was not decisive, as the majority claimed it to be, and that a jury should determine if deadly force was justified. He stated a jury should be used, instead of the case "being decided by a group of elderly appellate judges"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_v._Harris)
- [As a law and order liberal, she consistently stands with police against outspoken Justice Sotomayer.](https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/11/sonia-sotomayor-dissents-in-mullenix-police-shooting-case.html)
#### Others