Some formatting fixes.
This commit is contained in:
parent
89463b5537
commit
c8dfd5911e
@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
|
|||||||
I have two proposals having to do with the way national holds votes.
|
I have a proposal having to do with the way national holds votes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Switch away from the representative(grouped) branch-based voting that we do now, to individual, low-level voting (direct democracy).
|
1. Switch away from the representative(grouped), branch-based voting that we do now, to individual, low-level voting (direct democracy).
|
||||||
- Instead of waiting for branch delegates to report that they've received enough, we can simply wait for a quorum of all members(maybe once 1/2 or 2/3rds of all members have voted, then it can pass)
|
- Wait for a minimum quorum of all members(1/2 or 2/3rds of all members)
|
||||||
|
- Wait for an expiration time (1 week or 2 weeks, etc)
|
||||||
2. Switch to range or approval voting.
|
2. Switch to range or approval voting.
|
||||||
- We could either create a private facebook group(or use the one we already have) for approval voting.
|
- We could either create a private facebook group(or use the one we already have) for approval voting.
|
||||||
- Or use [this site for range voting called simplevote, I built for us to use(a sample poll)](https://simplevote.ml/#/poll/QL5)
|
- Or use [this site for range voting called simplevote, I built for us to use(a sample poll)](https://simplevote.ml/#/poll/QL5)
|
||||||
@ -60,7 +61,8 @@ I've built a site that uses it called [simplevote, it might just be easiest to s
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
- [Range voting](http://rangevoting.org/UniqBest.html) is olympic score voting, so each voter chooses between `0-10` on candidates, with 10 being yes / liking, 5 being neutral, and 0 being no / dislike.
|
- [Range voting](http://rangevoting.org/UniqBest.html) is olympic score voting, so each voter chooses between `0-10` on candidates, with 10 being yes / liking, 5 being neutral, and 0 being no / dislike.
|
||||||
- **You don't have to vote for every option**, not voting won't hurt your current votes.
|
- **You don't have to vote for every option**, not voting won't hurt your current votes.
|
||||||
- Range voting beats out [approval (a subset of it)](http://rangevoting.org/AppExec.html), [IRV](http://rangevoting.org/rangeVirv.html), and [First past the post](http://rangevoting.org/Plurality.html) for [minimizing voter regret.](http://rangevoting.org/UniqBest.html).
|
- Range voting beats out [approval (a subset of it)](http://rangevoting.org/AppExec.html), [IRV](http://rangevoting.org/rangeVirv.html), and [First past the post](http://rangevoting.org/Plurality.html) for [minimizing voter regret.](http://rangevoting.org/UniqBest.html)
|
||||||
|
- Votes must pass with an average score greater than say, 5 or 6.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||

|

|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user