kjodle/the-codex
kjodle/the-codex
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases 2 Wiki Activity

Typofixes to «naps» chapter

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Kenneth John Odle 2024-06-09 11:58:46 -04:00
parent 20444a83bd
commit 13a67440fa
1 changed files with 4 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
004/codex-004.tex
View File

@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ As I said way back in the first issue, I define a hack as ``an appropriate appli
Way back in issue \#1 of this zine\footnote{Which is only three issues ago, but considering that I published it in 2021, it seems \textit{like} a long time ago. I really need to get my act together and get these out on a more regular basis.} I talked about a workflow for scanning documents because I am trying to be as digital as possible.
In that article ``A Scanner Darkly, but with a workflow'' I mentioned that I used one piece of commercial software (VueScan) because it did what no FOSS\footnote{Free and Open Source} software could do: work with my printer and also sort pages effectively when my scanner's ADF\footnote{Automatic Document Feeder} does not duplex (i.e., it does not flip pages over to scan the other side). And while it is great software, and I did not mind paying the \$100 for a one-year subscription to it (the software company behind it is pretty much a father and son team), I didn't like being dependent on it.
In that article ``A Scanner Darkly, but with a workflow'' I mentioned that I used one piece of commercial software (VueScan) because it did what no FOSS\footnote{Free and Open Source} software that I knew of at the time could do: work with my printer and also sort pages effectively when my scanner's ADF\footnote{Automatic Document Feeder} does not duplex (i.e., it does not flip pages over to scan the other side). And while it is great software, and I did not mind paying the \$100 for a one-year subscription to it (the software company behind it is pretty much a father and son team), I didn't like being dependent on it.
The reasoning is simple. If a company decides to stop producing a product, that's it; you're done. I used to have a great plugin on my WordPress sites that added social media sharing icons to each post. The company that made it got bought out by Oracle. You might think this is a great thing, because Oracle is a big huge company with a lot of resources. But often, when big huge companies buy small independent companies, they are only interested in one or two of their products, and let the rest go. And this is exactly what happened. Oracle suddenly decided they weren't going to support this plugin and it just stopped working. The company's webpage for the plugin redirected to an Oracle page that basically said ``fuck off'' and little more. No explanation, no recommendations of similar plugins, nothing.
@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ Even better, NAPS2 had an ``interleave'' feature, which meant that I didn't need
The only problem was that NAPS2 offered \textit{four} versions of this command: interleave, deinterleave, alternate interleave, and alternate deinterleave. (These are very neatly contained under the ``Reorder'' icon in the main menu.) I knew one of those was what I needed; I just needed to figure out which.
I'm a scientist, so I experimented. I took five sheets of paper, wrote the odd numbers 1-9 on the front side and the corresponding even numbers 2-10 on the back side. If you flipped through them, you would see something like what you see in figure \ref{naps2-orig}
I'm a scientist, so I experimented. I took five sheets of scrap paper, wrote the odd numbers 1-9 on the front side and the corresponding even numbers 2-10 on the back side. If you flipped through them, you would see something like what you see in figure \ref{naps2-orig}
\begin{figure}[h]
\caption{The document as originally drawn}
@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ You're probably not going to get a perfect book back, because the options are pr
Even though NAPS2 was designed to be a pdf scanner, it also has the ability to save individual scans as images. Even more importantly, because each scanned page is basically an image, you can also edit each page as an image by double clicking on it, where you get editing options like crop and rotate, in addition to the ones I mentioned earlier. This is pretty handy if you're scanning something like a manual that has different sized pages, or is printed on large sheets and folded into a box so that you have to scan it in sections,\footnote{Every piece of furniture I've ever assembled has instructions like this, but I've run into quite a few manuals that are miniature versions of this, like the earbuds I wear on my daily walk.} or a package that has care instructions.
And if you're wondering why I keep banging on about manuals, it's because I do keep them. For years, I kept them all in a large three ring binder filled with page protectors that I could slip them into. It was big and awkward, and I didn't dare grab it the wrong way, or I'd have manuals all over the floor.
And if you're wondering why I keep banging on about manuals, it's because I do keep them. For years, I kept them all in a large three ring binder filled with page protectors that I could slip them into. It was big, and it was awkward, and I didn't dare grab it the wrong way or I'd have manuals all over the floor.
At some point, I realized that most manuals are available in convenient pdf form from the manufacturer's website, so I started just downloading those, making sure the pdf was identical (or identical \textit{enough}) to the original, and then tossing the original in the recycling. But for those that aren't—yep, I scan them.
@ -707,9 +707,7 @@ which gives us:
\noindent{}\ch[frac-style=xfrac]{3/2} (diagonal fraction)
\vspace{\baselineskip}
Like I said, this one operates a lot like \texttt{mhchem}. If \texttt{mhchem} works for you, there's no need to look further. But if you need more control over the appearance of your formulas and equations, \texttt{chemformula} will give you a lot of that control.
Like I said earlier, if your needs are simple, \texttt{mhchem} is a good choice. But if you need more control over your output, then \texttt{chemformula} will do a great job for you. It's slightly less intuitive, but it is well-documented, and the trade-off is a much higher degree of control.
Like I said, this one operates a lot like \texttt{mhchem}. If \texttt{mhchem} works for you, there's no need to look further. But if you need more control over the appearance of your formulas and equations, \texttt{chemformula} will give you a lot of that control. It's also very well documented.
\section{Package \texttt{chemfig}}