* Added Danish translation * Cleaned up a spelling mistake * Corrected spelling mistake * Added Danish references * chore: Rebase README.da.md Co-authored-by: Andrew Rump <ar@businessnow.dk> Co-authored-by: James Harris <wopian@wopian.me>
5.2 KiB
Contributing
🎌 Čeština, Dansk, Deutsch, English, Español, Français, Italiano, Kurdi, Lietuvių, Nederlands, Norsk, Polski, Português, Türkçe, Ελληνικά, العربية, 日本語, 正體中文, 简体中文, 한국어
The source code in this repository was digitized manually from paper printouts, so typos and other discrepancies have been introduced accidentally. The code shall be modified to be made consistent with the following scanned printouts:
Useful Extensions
GitHub has syntax support for the AGC assembly language built-in. Unfortunately your code editor will not, however there are AGC language extensions that provides syntax highlighting for the following editors:
- Atom†
- CodeBlocks
- Eclipse
- Kate
- ProgrammersNotepad
- Sublime Text 3†
- TextPad
- Vim
- Visual Studio Code†
- jEdit
† Supports automatic formatting
Formatting
Note: GitHub and extensions marked above will ensure you're using the correct formatting automatically.
- Use tab indentation
- Use tab width of 8
- Trim trailing whitespace
What do I check?
Any discrepancies between the scans and the source code in this repository.
Comments
Comments in the transcribed code MUST match the scans exactly.
Common issues you should look out for while proofing include, but not limited to:
Typographic Errors
In some places, the original developers made typographic errors while writing comments. Some of these were mistakenly corrected during the initial digitisation, however the digitisation has also introduced typographic errors that were not present in the scans.
For example, if the digitised comments contained SPACECRAFT
, but SPAECRAFT
was printed in the scans, then the digitisation MUST be corrected to SPAECRAFT
(missing C
).
Likewise, if a word has a typo in the digitisation but is spelt correctly in the scans then the typo MUST be corrected.
Spaces
Spaces between two characters in comments SHOULD match the scans. In most cases (see the discussion in #316), this is:
- Single space for new words.
- Double space for new sentences.
- Triple space for indentations.
Not all pages in the scans follow this generalisation, if the scans only have a single space instead of a double space, use a single space.
Line breaks
- Line breaks with
R0000
in column 1 should match the scans exactly. - Line breaks with*out*
R0000
in column 1 should contain only 1 or 2 blank lines in a row.- If there are more than 2 blank lines breaks, strip the extra line breaks.
- Lines with
R0000
in column 1 do not count towards this.
- Lines with
- In the source images, these were created by an unprinted digit in column 8. A 2 there forced a double space (single blank line) and a 3 forced a triple space (double blank line). Values 4-8 were defined but never used. Read more about it in #159
- If there are more than 2 blank lines breaks, strip the extra line breaks.
For example the following:
R0819 SUBROUTINE TO SKIP...
R0820
0821 LAMPTEST CS IMODES33
Should become:
R0819 SUBROUTINE TO SKIP...
R0820
0820 LAMPTEST CS IMODES33
Note
Before you make a PR, please make sure your changes are consistent with the scans!